Tuesday, August 7, 2007

"The mother of revolution and crime is poverty"(Aristotle)

Revolution and crime have plagued societies and governments ever since the olden days of its existence. Revolution involves the uprising of the citizens against the state government, usually consisting of strikes which bring economies to standstills, restricting income to families, and riots which involve violent confrontations among groups of people and the police, henceforth virtually desecrating any form of order of law in society, embedding a sense of insecurity and fear deep into people's hearts. Crime may seem mediocre in comparison, as its effects are much less damaging to society or government. It is the frequency of their occurences and methods carried out to commit these crimes, in turn reflecting humanity's dark side, which is appaling and damaging to social security and citizen welfare and safety. Revolutions occur when many citizens reach breaking point to an extent that they want to rid themselves of a fatuous leading government, whereas crime occurs when a person reaches breaking point, be it in terms of finance, desire or anger, hence the former is less frequent. Poverty, rather, is the consequence of a lack of financial resources to such an extent that it involves the inability of one to fulfill basic survival or living needs, such as food and water. Therefore, to a larger extent do I agree with the above statement. Throughout history, the usual causes that fuel the implementation of crime or revolution against the governments or other organisations are directly or indirectly due to financial benefits being compromised, or that their own inability to earn these finances force people to resort to drastic and harmful, disruptive measures. However, causes of crime may also be due to other factors such as anger, over-consumption of alcohol or desire, and for revolutions, it may be due to inequality in terms of discrimination and suppressions applying to a certain race or religion for instance.


One reason for crime would be the poverty of the people. The latter deprives people from their ability to support themselves or other loved ones financally so as to provide for basic neccessities such as food essential for survival. For instance, longitudinal studies in Canada have shown that children who live in poverty, especially those deprived of basic neccessities, are more likely to commit crime in later stages of life. Research has also shown that the intervention of couselling or national social organisations such as the Canadian council on social development on youths at risk of immersing themselves in a life of crime have significantly reduced crime rate in the future. This proves that desperation drives the human soul into commiting harmful and despicable acts of crime which contradicts human nature and values immensely. They would then see crime as a quick method of obtaining financial resources for their own survival, which anyone would prioritise as top in life, when they cannot support themselves. Such crimes include robbery and theft, burglary and so forth.


One reason for revolutions against governments would also be poverty. The latter deprives people from their ability to support themselves or loved ones financially so as to provide for basic neccessities such as food essential for survival. The government utilises economic policies so as to improve the latter which in turn improves employment, ensuring that people earn their keep to support themselves. However, when the government fails to prevent a declining economy and spreading poverty, the blame is shifted onto the government. For instance, in the late 19th - early 20th century in China, whereby the Qing monarchy took charge of government, people were poor due to foreign intervention from various western countries who robbed China of its resources, causing an adverse economic downturn which left people jobless and penniless. Poverty became rampant throughout the country, leading to anti-Qing sentiments which eventually led to the overthrowing of the fatuous and weak monarchy who succumbed to Western unreasonable demands. This shows that when people's survival is threatened due to a lack of financial resources, they tend to resort to drastic measures to fulfill their basic essential needs which they prioritise as top. Since the government is unable to accomplish the job of ensuring the welfare of the people by securing economic stability and jobs, people are not obliged either to continue allowing the present government to rule and hence, revolution would occur so as to remove the inefficient and welcome other reforms of new governments which would probably do a better job.

On the other hand, there are other factors that give rise to crime and revolution, not only poverty. Such factors respectively include anger, desire or over-consumption of alcohol, as well as racial, religious or gender inequality in countries.

Many people tend to commit crimes when their minds reach an unstable state, which compels them to do things rashly and irrationally. These states can be attained by breaking points of anger, high levels of desire not associated with money, and additionally the loss of proper thinking and being sober via over-consumption of alcohol which is widely available globally. For instance, crime rate comprises a large proportion of murder, manslaughter, assault, rape, child abuse, drunk driving and so forth. Murder, manslaughter, assault and rape are associated with a loss of soberness which leads to irrational thinking, makes a human accomplish such inhumane acts. Murder and other physically harmful acts are associated with anger, whereby hatred of a person results from conflicts into anger which in turn compels humans to harm the other individual as anger controls the mind. Similarly, desire such as horny and perverted thoughts lead to rape and child rape, etc. As such, a huge proportion of crime resides from causes involving financial resources. Henceforth, poverty may not be entirely the mother of crime as stated, but only to a certain extent.

Revolution does not arise basically from poverty, as it is due to unhappiness and disatisfaction of the government, which covers many areas which do not comprise only poverty. One of which may be racial, religious, gender or any form of discrimination which leads to revolution. For instance, the racial conflicts between the protestants and catholics in northern ireland has been a source of conflict for many decades, and catholics have made many attempts to change the status quo by appealing to governments of both northern ireland and ireland mainland. When they do reach a boiling point, they would rebel against the government in fits of anger as they are being supressed by a protestant government, henceforth compromising their human privileges and rights, as well as welfare and social security from riots and conflicts. People would rebel in order to change this.



Monday, August 6, 2007

An insight into Japan's economic&social problems

In Japan these days, certain towns are becoming healthy and lively once more. The economy is recovering at a rapid pace, and urban buildings and structures are being built for accomodation and recreation, even aesthetic appreciation. Huge SUVs plague the tiny roads of Japan, ferrying the rich to their destinations of fun and enjoyment. The 54 storey tokyo midtown complex has been built, featuring another major attraction, an arts museum inside the tallest skyscraper, coupled with a newly built Ritz-Carlton hotel, makes the capital an advanced modern city oozing with tourist attractions and potential revenue. On the other hand, the armpits of Japan, including bankrupt cities like Yubari, reflect the hazardous lack of vision of Japanese Prime minister Shinzo Abe in his governing methods. He is unable to promptly and decisively nip the problems in the bud, which include the widening social disparity in terms of financial status, the economic insecurity foraging through the cities of Japan, as well as the aging workforce, snowballing debt owing other countries, additionally external competition such as China and U.S. However, the most essential problem lies in the political status of Abe, as he is unable to solve these serious problems leeching the country of prosperity and social satisfaction, henceforth he has brought in pesty critics who have questioned his decisions and have striked at every opportunity to bring him down lest a mistake of great proportion occurs that could spell disbenefit for the citizen's welfare, which Abe seems to have neglected. These problems would spell the downfall of Japan's economy.
One reason is that there is a greater disparity between the lower and higher classes of society despite Japan hailing itself as a largely middle class country. This is because the income levels between the 2 groups are widening apart, as the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, the economy is affected adversely. The economy of Japan is shooting sky high, with annual GDP rising from 0.1% in 2001 to 2.7% in 2006. The corporate profits of Japanese companies have reached a record 428 billion, accompanied by a seemingly impressive low 4.1% unemployment rate. However, the average monthly earnings of Japanese decrease instead from $2881 in 2002 to a more meagre $2749 in 2006. The consumer-confidence index is erratic and public anxiety soars to a 67.6% of all Japanese. The former's standard of living is decreasing, or so they reckon. This trend exists due to the selfish desire for money of the leaders of such thriving corporations, hence they keep more of the profits for themselves, rather than distribute it throughout the company by increasing wages. Stagnant wages result, and as confidence in the country's economy plunge, people are less willing to spend on products and services that Japan or any economy relies on to keep it going. With less profits, the companies and firms suffer losses, hence the economy declines generally. Poverty, an extreme case of wage decrement consequence, presently plagues the country to such an extent that it ranks 2nd behind the U.S in terms of relative poverty. This threatens the sustainability of economic prosperity, and will eventually lead to a bankrupt country as in the case of Yubari, especially coupled with other head-throbbing problems such as huge debts.
Unfortunately, Japan has such a problem. She has obtained much loans from other countries for her own benefit to build up her economy and for development. Her debts amount to a staggering 175.5% of its annual total GDP, making it the country to be most in the red. With such a huge snowballing debt robbing the country of its revenue, less of it can be allocated to solve other social and economic problems such as educational system loopholes, as well as the former social insecurity issue. As such a huge debt cannot be cleared in a short period, it remains a parasite to Japan's economy, leeching away its prosperity, additionally and in turn worsening living standards of the citizens by further reducing wage rates. This worsens the economy further like a vicious cycle since people are poorer, they spend less. Abe's plitical status might then be in serious jeopardy.
Similarly to the context of Singapore, Japan is heavily reliant on trade with other countries. This means that imports and exports of products and revenue earned from such processes comprises a huge proportion of the country's revenue. Such countries include mainly U.S and China, as them, being the strongest developed superpowers presently, have a higher demand of Japanese goods. However, when diplomatic relations falter or sour, such as with China, Japan cannot rely on domestic consumer spending which is so feeble in supporting the economy with the above stated problems. The economy will face serious setbacks when it cannot fall back on foreign countries, and with people knowing that, they have less faith in the economy as well as Abe's leadership. This not only puts the economy of Japan in the hands of outsiders, it also endangers its prosperity depending on Japan's relations with other countries. Japan's entertaining abilities come in handy in such situations, making the country seem inferior and reliant.
The aging population, the bane of many economies, also threatens Japanese economy. This is due to the fact that when a workforce ages, elder members are seen to be less productive due to physical restrains as well as outdated knowledge in terms of skills and essential requirements. For instance, Japan's workforce is estimated to drop form a present 66million to a paltry 55 million in 2035. This is due modern thinking and poverty. People have less money to provide for children, and more women seeking equality, reject the idea of being a housewife, but would rather carve out an impressive career. Hence as less babies are born, less people are able to replace the retired members of the workforce. The latter shrinks and is forced to consist more of the elderly. Coupled with Japanese low mortality rate due to healthy eating habits, more senior citizens would live to a riper, older age so as to burden the economy further when the latter is faced with the challenge to support these senior citizens. The productivity and power of the workforce decreases as it ages, hence the economy produces less products and exports in terms of rate, the former suffers as less revenue is earned. Reiterating, people's lives deteriorate, and political faith in Abe decreases.
Last but not least, the political problems arising from Shinzo's ineffective leadership is the most quinessential in the equation which spells disaster for Japan. It is seen that he lacks a vision for Japan. His ability to reassure his citizens of economic stability clashes with economic realities, and most people know it. His solutions to the country's problems either backfire or lack prompt action to carry out, though a stable foundation has been laid for its implementation. Such examples include his party member's urge for a higher birth rate, incidentally yet disrespectfully refering Japanese women as 'birth-machines', angering the people and critics, who seize the chance to pinpoint faults in Abe's leadership. His economic plan for development, such as 'Innovation 25' to be implemented in 2025, which emphasizes R&D, lack serious action to implement. Despite his success with dealing with foreign affairs, it has not convinced Japan that Abe will be the new leader to lead Japan into an era of prosperity, since he cannot decisively and swiftly eliminate problems plagueing the country. It should occur to him to either buck up, or ship out of politics.